ArticleCureus2024
Pathogenesis of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Odontogenic Infection-Preceding Type and Osteonecrosis-Preceding Type.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental Mandibular FDG Uptake on PET/CT Preceding Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Patient Receiving High-Dose Denosumab: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- A retrospective study on odontogenic and non-odontogenic medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Potential differences in clinical features and treatment outcomes.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) develops from odontogenic infection. However, there are also some cases of MRONJ developing from sites with no teeth, no root canal lesions, or no periodontal disease. This study aimed to retrospectively review radiographic images of MRONJ cases and examine the differences in characteristics between MRONJ suspected to be related to dental infection (odontogenic MRONJ) and MRONJ that occurred without dental involvement or of unknown cause (non-odontogenic MRONJ). Materials and methods One hundred and forty-five patients were diagnosed with MRONJ at Kansai Medical University Hospital and Kansai Medical University Medical Center. The following variables were investigated: sex, age, primary disease, MRONJ site, body mass index, smoking habit, diabetes, corticosteroids, type of antiresorptive agent, administration period, CT findings (separation of sequestrum, osteolysis, periosteal reaction, and osteosclerosis), trigger, leukocytes, neutrocytes, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, serum albumin, and serum creatinine levels. Results In the univariate analysis, significant differences between odontogenic and non-odontogenic MRONJs were found in patients whose primary disease was malignancy, receiving denosumab (DMB), and with short administration period of antiresorptive agent, no osteolysis, periosteal reaction, and serum creatinine level. In multivariate analysis, non-odontogenic MRONJ was significantly more common in patients with no osteolysis and with periosteal reaction. Conclusion Non-odontogenic MRONJ tends to occur more frequently in patients treated with high-dose DMB, and there were significantly more cases of non-osteolytic MRONJ without radiographic evidence of osteolysis or with periosteal reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.