ArticleiScience2024
A deep learning model for DNA enhancer prediction based on nucleotide position aware feature encoding.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- iEnhancer-Flow: Integrating Transformer-Based Sequence Learning with DNA Shape Insights for Robust Enhancer Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Efficient and interpretable DNA/RNA representation using Komlós-Hadamard transforms.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- EDEN: multiscale expected density of nucleotide encoding for enhanced DNA sequence classification with hybrid deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancers, genomic DNA elements, regulate neighboring gene expression crucial for biological processes like cell differentiation and stress response. However, current machine learning methods for predicting DNA enhancers often underutilize hidden features in gene sequences, limiting model accuracy. Hence, this article proposes the PDCNN model, a deep learning-based enhancer prediction method. PDCNN extracts statistical nucleotide representations from gene sequences, discerning positional distribution information of nucleotides in modifier-like DNA sequences. With a convolutional neural network structure, PDCNN employs dual convolutional and fully connected layers. The cross-entropy loss function iteratively updates using a gradient descent algorithm, enhancing prediction accuracy. Model parameters are fine-tuned to select optimal combinations for training, achieving over 95% accuracy. Comparative analysis with traditional methods and existing models demonstrates PDCNN's robust feature extraction capability. It outperforms advanced machine learning methods in identifying DNA enhancers, presenting an effective method with broad implications for genomics, biology, and medical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.