Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868165›Full record

ArticleFire and materials2021

Toward understanding ignition vulnerabilities to firebrand showers using reduced-scale experiments.

Sayaka Suzuki, Samuel L Manzello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fire and materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sayaka SuzukiLarge Fire Laboratory, National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster (NRIFD), Chofu, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6635-5512
Samuel L ManzelloFire Research Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3171-7333

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few years, the large outdoor fire problem has been a growing concern throughout the world. It is recommended to clear the combustibles around homes and within communities to avoid potential loss of properties, as firebrand shower ignition is a dangerous threat. One of the common combustibles around homes is mulching materials. A reduced-scale experimental protocol was developed to study ignition of mulching materials by firebrands and resulting impact to adjunct wall assemblies. Reduced-scale experimental results were compared with full-scale experimental results. Specifically, two trends were of interest in the comparisons. First, the ranking of the ease of ignition for various mulch types from exposure to firebrand showers. Second, if a given mulch type ignited from exposure to firebrand showers, was the resulting mulch bed fire able to ignite the adjacent wall assembly. The reduced-scale experimental results captured some of these trends observed from full-scale experiments but not completely. The findings still suggest that the reduced-scale experiments may give insights into how easily different mulch beds may be ignited by firebrands, as compared to much more costly and time-consuming full-scale experiments. While it is interesting to conduct full-scale experiments, this is very expensive and not always practical, so the authors are devising far cheaper reduced-scale experiments to provide more in-depth scientific understanding of firebrand shower ignition of construction components.

Indexed as

embersfirebrandsignitionlarge outdoor fireswildland urban interface fires

Identifiers

PMID38868165
PMCPMC11167714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.