ArticleHealth information science and systems2024
A transfer learning enabled approach for ocular disease detection and classification.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Image-Based Deep Learning for Cataract Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- A novel hybrid deep learning pipeline for precise segmentation of skin cancer lesions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- SSLVNet: an explainable multi-modal hybrid framework integrating self-supervised learning and vision transformers for multi-label classification of retinal diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- ODDM: Integration of SMOTE Tomek with Deep Learning on Imbalanced Color Fundus Images for Classification of Several Ocular Diseases.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Epilepsy Diagnosis from EEG Signals Using Continuous Wavelet Transform-Based Depthwise Convolutional Neural Network Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocular diseases pose significant challenges in timely diagnosis and effective treatment. Deep learning has emerged as a promising technique in medical image analysis, offering potential solutions for accurately detecting and classifying ocular diseases. In this research, we propose Ocular Net, a novel deep learning model for detecting and classifying ocular diseases, including Cataracts, Diabetic, Uveitis, and Glaucoma, using a large dataset of ocular images. The study utilized an image dataset comprising 6200 images of both eyes of patients. Specifically, 70% of these images (4000 images) were allocated for model training, while the remaining 30% (2200 images) were designated for testing purposes. The dataset contains images of five categories that include four diseases, and one normal category. The proposed model uses transfer learning, average pooling layers, Clipped Relu, Leaky Relu and various other layers to accurately detect the ocular diseases from images. Our approach involves training a novel Ocular Net model on diverse ocular images and evaluating its accuracy and performance metrics for disease detection. We also employ data augmentation techniques to improve model performance and mitigate overfitting. The proposed model is tested on different training and testing ratios with varied parameters. Additionally, we compare the performance of the Ocular Net with previous methods based on various evaluation parameters, assessing its potential for enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of ocular disease diagnosis. The results demonstrate that Ocular Net achieves 98.89% accuracy and 0.12% loss value in detecting and classifying ocular diseases by outperforming existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.