ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024
Measurement properties of the Swedish version of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI): A Rasch analysis.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thresholds for minimum clinically important difference, minimal important change and patient acceptable symptom state for the ACL-RSI and the K-SES in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- No differences at return to sport in psychological profiles and results of muscle function tests between females with and without a second ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury after ACL reconstruction.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Measurement properties of the Swedish version of the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale: A Rasch analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Measurement properties of the Swedish version of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI): A Rasch analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the measurement properties, according to the Rasch Measurement Theory, of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI) in patients treated with ACL reconstruction in Sweden. Methods: ACL-RSI responses from 1065 patients treated with ACL reconstruction were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific registry. Rasch analyses were performed on ACL-RSI item response data using the RUMM2030plus software. The analyses focused on targeting (person-item threshold distribution), item hierarchy, response category thresholds, overall and individual item and person fit, differential item functioning (DIF), unidimensionality and reliability. Results: The ACL-RSI had compromised fit to the Rasch model, including DIF and malfunctioning response categories. Several items correlate with each other and the presumptions to aggregate item responses into one single score were not met. When accounting for local dependency, the measurement properties of the ACL-RSI improved in terms of model fit and DIF and unidimensionality were supported. Conclusion: The ACL-RSI was found to have signs of multidimensionality and local dependency, that is, the answers to one item are influenced by the answers to other items. As such, researchers should be careful when using the ACL-RSI as one single score to evaluate patients treated with ACL reconstruction, unless local dependency is accounted for in the scoring process. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.