ArticleHeliyon2024
Deep learning model based on contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting post-surgical survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Role of MRI-Based Artificial Intelligence in Individualized Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Value of radiomics and deep learning feature fusion models based on dce-mri in distinguishing sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma from lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a deep learning model based on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to predict post-surgical overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This bi-center retrospective study included 564 surgically resected patients with HCC and divided them into training (326), testing (143), and external validation (95) cohorts. This study used a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) ResNet to learn features from the pretreatment MR images (T1WIpre, late arterial phase, and portal venous phase) and got the deep learning score (DL score). Three cox regression models were established separately using the DL score (3D-CNN model), clinical features (clinical model), and a combination of above (combined model). The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate model performance. Results: We trained a 3D-CNN model to get DL score from samples. The C-index of the 3D-CNN model in predicting 5-year OS for the training, testing, and external validation cohorts were 0.746, 0.714, and 0.698, respectively, and were higher than those of the clinical model, which were 0.675, 0.674, and 0.631, respectively (P = 0.009, P = 0.204, and P = 0.092, respectively). The C-index of the combined model for testing and external validation cohorts was 0.750 and 0.723, respectively, significantly higher than the clinical model (P = 0.017, P = 0.016) and the 3D-CNN model (P = 0.029, P = 0.036). Conclusions: The combined model integrating the DL score and clinical factors showed a higher predictive value than the clinical and 3D-CNN models and may be more useful in guiding clinical treatment decisions to improve the prognosis of patients with HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.