ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimizing low-power task scheduling for multiple users and servers in mobile edge computing by the MUMS framework.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In today's increasingly popular Internet of Things (IoT) technology, its energy consumption issue is also becoming increasingly prominent. Currently, the application of Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) in IoT is becoming increasingly important, and scheduling its tasks to save energy is imperative. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose a Multi-User Multi-Server (MUMS) scheduling framework aimed at reducing the energy consumption in MEC. The framework starts with a model definition phase, detailing multi-user multi-server systems through four fundamental models: communication, offloading, energy, and delay. Then, these models are integrated to construct an energy consumption optimization model for MUMS. The final step involves utilizing the proposed L1_PSO (an enhanced version of the standard particle swarm optimization algorithm) to solve the optimization problem. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to typical scheduling algorithms, the MUMS framework is both reasonable and feasible. Notably, the L1_PSO algorithm reduces energy consumption by 4.6 % compared to Random Assignment and by 2.3 % compared to the conventional Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.