ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficacy of rituximab in treating steroid-resistant Graves' orbitopathy in active moderate-to-severe and sight-threatening forms: A retrospective observation from China.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab, tocilizumab, and teprotumumab in Graves' orbitopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Scan-rescan reproducibility and interobserver reliability of T1 and T2 measurements of extraocular muscles using a multi-dynamic multi-echo MRI sequence.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating steroid-resistant Graves' orbitopathy (GO) has been limitedly studied in Asians. Moreover, RTX has been considered even less for patients with steroid-resistant dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) who failed to undergo orbital decompression surgery for physical or financial reasons, or who responded poorly to the procedure. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of RTX in treating steroid-resistant active moderate-to-severe and sight-threatening GO in a Chinese population. Methods: Data from 28 patients with steroid-resistant GO prescribed a single dose of 500 mg RTX were retrospectively retrieved. Treatment responses and contributing factors were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up time was 22 (8-34) weeks. 23 (82.1 %) patients had a positive objective outcome recommended by the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO), while 25 (92.6 %) had a decrease in 7-item clinical activity score (CAS) by at least 2. Diplopia, visual dysfunction, and MRI-detected T2 relaxation time of the involved extraocular muscles improved significantly at the last follow-up compared to baseline (81.0 % vs. 47.6 %, 38.9 % vs. 16.7 %, and 87.8 (8.64) vs. 75.8 (10.9) ms, respectively; all Conclusion: A single dose of 500 mg RTX seemed to be an effective and tolerable treatment for steroid-resistant GO. However, larger-scale studies with a control group are required for a more solid conclusion. The role of RTX in steroid-resistant DON management where surgery is unavailable or ineffective should be further explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.