Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867949›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Analyzing hate speech dynamics on Twitter/X: Insights from conversational data and the impact of user interaction patterns.

António Fonseca, Catarina Pontes, Sérgio Moro, Fernando Batista, Ricardo Ribeiro, Rita Guerra, Paula Carvalho, Catarina Marques, Cláudia Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

António FonsecaInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), ISTAR, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina PontesInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), ISTAR, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sérgio MoroInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), ISTAR, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fernando BatistaInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Ricardo RibeiroInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Rita GuerraISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa and Center for Psychological Research and Social Intervention (CIS-ISCTE), Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula CarvalhoINESC-ID, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina MarquesISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa and Business Research Unit (BRU-ISCTE), Lisbon, Portugal.
Cláudia SilvaITI-LARSyS and IST, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the pervasive issue of hate speech within Twitter/X Portuguese network conversations, offering a multifaceted analysis of its characteristics. This study utilizes a mixed-method approach, combining several methodologies of network analysis (triad census and participation shifts) over the network of interaction between users. Qualitative manual content annotation was applied to the dataset to dissect different patterns of hate speech on the platform. Key findings reveal that the number of users followed by an individual and potentially reads is a relevant predictor for a user's propensity to post aggressive content. We concluded also that during a conversation thread, hate speech happens significantly more within the first 2 h of interaction. Transitivity of interactions and individual expression are considerably lower as more hate speech is prevalent in conversations. Our research confirms that hate speech is usually expressed by external individuals who intrude into conversations. Conversely, the expression of hate speech of indirect type by third parties interfering in conversations is uncommon. We also found that counter-speech discourse is strongly correlated with a type of discourse that typically avoids conflict and is not privately held.

Identifiers

PMID38867949
PMCPMC11168420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.