Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867891›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024

Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem resistant

Sakiusa C Baleivanualala, Silivia Matanitobua, Vika Soqo, Shayal Smita, Josese Limaono, Sajnel C Sharma, Swastika V Devi, Lusiana V Boseiwaqa, Numa Vera, Silpa Kumar and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-Resolution Genomic Surveillance of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Environmental contamination with carbapenem resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sakiusa C BaleivanualalaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Silivia MatanitobuaMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Vika SoqoMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Shayal SmitaMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Josese LimaonoMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Sajnel C SharmaMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Swastika V DeviCollege of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Lusiana V BoseiwaqaMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Numa VeraCollege of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Silpa KumarMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Amele LalibuliMinistry of Health, Fiji.
Josese MailuluPacific Laboratory Specialists, Suva, Fiji.
Donald WilsonCollege of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Yvette SamisoniAspen Medical, Lautoka, Fiji.
John A CrumpDivision of Health Sciences, Centre for International Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
James E UssherDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem resistant organisms (CROs) such as Methods: CROs isolated from 211 (77.3%) non-sterile (urinary catheters, urine, sputum, wound swab, and endotracheal tube) and 62 (22.7%) normally sterile (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, intravascular catheter, and aspirates) body sites of 272 patients treated at the three major hospitals in Fiji, the Colonial War Memorial Hospital (CWMH), Lautoka Hospital (LTKH), and Labasa Hospital (LBSH), and outer peripheral health centres around Fiji, were analysed. Clinical and demographic patient data such as age, sex, admission diagnosis, admission and discharge dates, patient outcomes, date of death, start and end date of meropenem and colistin treatment were reviewed. These CRO isolates comprised Findings: Of 272 patients, 140 (51.5%) were male, the median (range) age of patients was 45 (<1-89) years, 161 (59.2%) were I-Taukei, 104 (38.2%) Fijians of Indian descent, and 7 (2.6%) were from other ethnic backgrounds. 234 (86.0%) of these 272 patients, had their first positive CRO sample collected ≥72 h following admission and the remaining 38 (14.0%) were isolated within 72 h following admission. Of the 273 CROs, 146 (53.5%) were collected at the CWMH, 66 (24.2%) LTKH, and 61 (22.3%) LBSH, while 62 (22.7%) were isolated from normally sterile sites and 211 (77.3%) from sites that are not sterile. Of 273 isolates, 131 (48.0%) were CR Interpretation: We identified nosocomial transmission of distinct clones of CR Funding: This project was funded by the Otago Medical School Foundations Trust (Dean's Bequest Fund) and a Fiji National University seed grant. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenem resistantEscherichia coliKlebsiella pneumoniaePseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID38867891
PMCPMC11166881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.