ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2024
The golden hour in shock management: do a lot, do it quickly.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiogenic shock is not a single entity: therapeutic implications.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- The ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) Hemodialysis System in Postoperative Cardiogenic Shock and Multiple Organ Failure: First Results in Cardiac Surgery Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock can be defined as a state of inadequate organ perfusion linked primarily to cardiac pump dysfunction. The two predominant causes of this condition are acute myocardial infarction and acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). In recent years, a significant increase in cases of cardiogenic shock from ADHF has been described. Recent evidence has defined that the factors with the greatest impact on the prognosis in this context are the early clinical assessment, the definition of the aetiology, the timely application of pharmacological therapies, or individualized mechanical supports for the circulation. Haemodynamic monitoring can help in the phenotyping of cardiogenic shock and therefore guide therapeutic choices, especially if implemented with the aid of advanced monitoring tools such as the Swan-Ganz catheter. Finally, the presence of a dedicated shock team in the 'hub' centres is fundamental, which facilitates the choice of the best therapeutic strategy on a case-by-case basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.