Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867858›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2024

There are those who would like zero LDL cholesterol.

Claudio Borghi, Alessio Bragagni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudio BorghiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna.
Alessio BragagniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overwhelming evidence that the reduction of LDL cholesterol (LDLc) levels is associated with a parallel reduction in cardiovascular (CV) risk has led the scientific community to progressively and constantly reduce the optimal therapeutic targets of LDLc, both in patients with known CV disease and in patients undergoing primary prevention. The recent introduction of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors has allowed clinicians to observe reductions in LDLc levels that go well beyond the limits set by the main international guidelines; following the 'the lower the better' paradigm, it is natural to ask how low LDLc can be reduced, whether this intervention is associated with a further reduction in CV risk and, above all, whether there are no issues related to safety in the use of polypharmacotherapies that determine an extreme reduction in LDLc levels. The purpose of this article is to summarize the main scientific evidence on the topic, trying to provide an answer to all clinicians who 'would like their LDLc to be-almost-zero'.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular riskDyslipidaemiaEzetimibeLDL cholesterolPCSK9 inhibitorsStatins

Identifiers

PMID38867858
PMCPMC11167977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.