Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867841›Full record

ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2023

Emotion dysregulation as mediator between mentalizing capacity and affective states: An exploratory study.

Saeed Ghanbari, Ahmad Asgarizadeh, Elahe Vahidi, Parisa Sadat Seyed Mousavi, Maryam Omidghaemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saeed GhanbariFaculty of Education and Psychology Shahid Beheshti University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-6014
Ahmad AsgarizadehFaculty of Education and Psychology Shahid Beheshti University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-0548
Elahe VahidiFaculty of Education and Psychology Shahid Beheshti University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5296-2090
Parisa Sadat Seyed MousaviFamily Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-3809
Maryam OmidghaemiFaculty of Education and Psychology Shahid Beheshti University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-1443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We intended to elucidate the relationship between mentalizing capacity and affective states by investigating the mediatory role of emotion dysregulation. Methods: A sample of nonclinical Iranian adults ( Results: Correlational analyses demonstrated that self- and other-related mentalizing were significantly and inversely associated with emotion dysregulation, which in turn was strongly linked with positive and negative affects. Using structural equation modeling, the results delineated emotion dysregulation as a mediator between self- and other-related mentalizing and affective states, predicting higher negative and lower positive affects. However, motivation to mentalize failed to predict positive affects and only contributed to lower negative affects directly. Conclusion: Mentalizing capacity was found to be indirectly linked with affective states through emotion dysregulation; hence, along with the previously substantiated association between emotion dysregulation and affective states and the partially established relationship between mentalizing capacity and affective states, we propose mentalizing incapacity to be at fault in the development of affective difficulties.

Indexed as

affective statesemotion dysregulationmentalizing capacity

Identifiers

PMID38867841
PMCPMC11114384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.