ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Laser axial scanning microdissection for high-efficiency dissection from uneven biological samples.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Double-pulse laser capture microdissection with a needle beam for reduced collateral damage in biological samples.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast and efficient separation of target samples is crucial for the application of laser-assisted microdissection in the molecular biology research field. Herein, we developed a laser axial scanning microdissection (LASM) system with an 8.6 times extended depth of focus by using an electrically tunable lens. We showed that the ablation quality of silicon wafers at different depths became homogenous after using our system. More importantly, for those uneven biological tissue sections within a height difference of no more than 19.2 µm, we have demonstrated that the targets with a size of microns at arbitrary positions can be dissected efficiently without additional focusing and dissection operations. Besides, dissection experiments on various biological samples with different embedding methods, which were widely adopted in biological experiments, also have shown the feasibility of our system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.