ReviewiMeta2022
Applications of de Bruijn graphs in microbiome research.
Review in iMeta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Extremely fast construction and querying of compacted and colored de Bruijn graphs with GGCAT.Genome research · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing has become an increasingly central component of microbiome research. The development of de Bruijn graph-based methods for assembling high-throughput sequencing data has been an important part of the broader adoption of sequencing as part of biological studies. Recent advances in the construction and representation of de Bruijn graphs have led to new approaches that utilize the de Bruijn graph data structure to aid in different biological analyses. One type of application of these methods has been in alternative approaches to the assembly of sequencing data like gene-targeted assembly, where only gene sequences are assembled out of larger metagenomes, and differential assembly, where sequences that are differentially present between two samples are assembled. de Bruijn graphs have also been applied for comparative genomics where they can be used to represent large sets of multiple genomes or metagenomes where structural features in the graphs can be used to identify variants, indels, and homologous regions in sequences. These de Bruijn graph-based representations of sequencing data have even begun to be applied to whole sequencing databases for large-scale searches and experiment discovery. de Bruijn graphs have played a central role in how high-throughput sequencing data is worked with, and the rapid development of new tools that rely on these data structures suggests that they will continue to play an important role in biology in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.