SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024
The natural evolution of untreated deep endometriosis and the effect of hormonal suppression: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The natural evolution of untreated deep endometriosis and the effect of hormonal suppression: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Lateral distribution of endometriotic lesions: the anatomical recesses hypothesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction open · 2026Review
- Deep pelvic endometriosis: clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment - a comprehensive review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Medical Nutrition Therapy in the Management of Patients with Obesity and Endometriosis: from the Mediterranean Diet To the Ketogenic Diet, Through Supplementation. The Role of the Nutritionist in Clinical Management.Current obesity reports · 2025Review
- Risk of endometriosis progression in infertile women trying to conceive naturally or using IVF.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Clinical features and management of thoracic endometriosis: a 20-year monocentric retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Expression and Function of Meflin in Human Endometrial Decidualization.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPeritoneal infiltrating and fibrotic endometriosis, also known as deep endometriosis, is the most severe manifestation of the disease that can cause severe complications including bowel and ureteral stenosis. The natural history of these lesions and the possible effect of hormonal treatments on their progression are undefined. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether and how frequently deep endometriosis progresses over time without or with ovarian suppression. This could inform management decisions in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsFor this pre-registered systematic review (CRD42023463518), the PubMed and Embase databases were screened, and studies published between 2000 and 2023 that serially evaluated the size of deep endometriotic lesions without or with hormonal treatment were selected. Data on the progression, stability, or regression of deep endometriotic lesions were recorded as absolute frequencies or mean volume variations. Estimates of the overall percentage of progression and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect model. When studies reported lesion progression as pre- and post-treatment volume means, the delta of the two-volume means was calculated and analyzed using the inverse variance method.
resultsA total of 29 studies were identified, of which 19 studies with 285 untreated and 730 treated patients were ultimately selected for meta-analysis. The overall estimate of the percentage of lesion progression in untreated individuals was 21.4% (95% CI, 6.8-40.8%; I
conclusionsUntreated deep endometriotic lesions progressed in about one in five patients. Medical therapy reduced but did not eliminate this risk. Given the organ function failure potentially caused by these lesions, the decision whether to use hormonal treatments in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women should always be shared, carefully weighing the potential benefits and harms of the two alternatives after extensive counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.