Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867640›Full record

SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

The natural evolution of untreated deep endometriosis and the effect of hormonal suppression: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Veronica Bandini, Francesca Giola, Deborah Ambruoso, Sonia Cipriani, Francesca Chiaffarino, Paolo Vercellini

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronica BandiniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Academic Center for Research on Adenomyosis and Endometriosis, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1788-9670
Francesca GiolaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Academic Center for Research on Adenomyosis and Endometriosis, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-0837-8355
Deborah AmbruosoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Academic Center for Research on Adenomyosis and Endometriosis, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-1815-3411
Sonia CiprianiGynecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0530-499X
Francesca ChiaffarinoGynecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-8108
Paolo VercelliniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Academic Center for Research on Adenomyosis and Endometriosis, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4195-0996

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health, Current research 2024 IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeritoneal infiltrating and fibrotic endometriosis, also known as deep endometriosis, is the most severe manifestation of the disease that can cause severe complications including bowel and ureteral stenosis. The natural history of these lesions and the possible effect of hormonal treatments on their progression are undefined. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether and how frequently deep endometriosis progresses over time without or with ovarian suppression. This could inform management decisions in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsFor this pre-registered systematic review (CRD42023463518), the PubMed and Embase databases were screened, and studies published between 2000 and 2023 that serially evaluated the size of deep endometriotic lesions without or with hormonal treatment were selected. Data on the progression, stability, or regression of deep endometriotic lesions were recorded as absolute frequencies or mean volume variations. Estimates of the overall percentage of progression and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect model. When studies reported lesion progression as pre- and post-treatment volume means, the delta of the two-volume means was calculated and analyzed using the inverse variance method.

resultsA total of 29 studies were identified, of which 19 studies with 285 untreated and 730 treated patients were ultimately selected for meta-analysis. The overall estimate of the percentage of lesion progression in untreated individuals was 21.4% (95% CI, 6.8-40.8%; I

conclusionsUntreated deep endometriotic lesions progressed in about one in five patients. Medical therapy reduced but did not eliminate this risk. Given the organ function failure potentially caused by these lesions, the decision whether to use hormonal treatments in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women should always be shared, carefully weighing the potential benefits and harms of the two alternatives after extensive counseling.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionEndometriosisFemaleHormone AntagonistsHumansHormone Antagonistsdeep endometriosishormonal therapymeta‐analysisnatural historyprogressionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38867640
PMCPMC11324912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.