ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024
In situ HER2 RNA expression as a predictor of pathologic complete response of HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted treatment.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-clinical trial targeting ER, FGFR and CDK4/6 in resistant hormone-positive breast cancer with FGFR alterations.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- HER2 testing: evolution and update for a companion diagnostic assay.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Transfer learning drives automatic HER2 scoring on HE-stained WSIs for breast cancer: a multi-cohort study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) remain standard biomarkers for therapeutic decisions in human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers (BCs); however, they are insufficient to explain the heterogeneous anti-HER2 response.
methodsWe aimed to investigate the correlation of in situ HER2 RNA expression (isHRE), using RNAscope, with HER2 biomarkers and the impact of isHRE on the pathological complete response (pCR) rates of 278 patients with HER2 IHC/fluorescence ISH (FISH)-positive BC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted treatment (NCTT).
resultsWe validated HER2 RNAscope scoring as a semiquantitative method to determine isHRE and showed a positive correlation between RNAscope scores and pCR rates, with particularly different rates between patients with a score of 5 versus 1-4 BCs (66.7% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.0001). There were higher RNAscope scores and pCR rates in patients with HER2 IHC 3 + versus IHC 2+/FISH + BCs and HER2 RNAscope scores and pCR rates showed similar non-linear positive correlations with HER2 copy numbers and HER2/centromere 17 ratios. Moreover, in each HER2-positive IHC/FISH category, higher pCR rates were observed in patients with RNAscope scores of 5 versus 1-4 BC. Patients achieving pCR had BCs with notably higher HER2 RNAscope scores. Multivariate analysis identified HER2 RNAscope 5 as a strong pCR predictor [odds ratio = 10.865, p < 0.001]. The combined impact of multivariate analysis-defined pCR predictors demonstrated that a higher pCR rate was observed in patients with a score of 5 versus a score of 1-4 BCs regardless of the status of hormone receptor and mono-or dual anti-HER2 blockade. CONCUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that high isHRE (RNAscope score 5) is a strong pCR predictor in patients with HER2-positive BCs receiving NCTT, highlighting the complementary role of isHRE in stratifying HER2 status in tissue. Such stratification is relevant to anti-HER2 therapeutic efficacy, particularly using the cutoff of score 1-4 versus 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.