Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867210›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

The venom and telopodal defence systems of the centipede Lithobius forficatus are functionally convergent serial homologues.

Vanessa Schendel, Carsten H G Müller, Matthes Kenning, Michael Maxwell, Ronald A Jenner, Eivind A B Undheim, Andy Sombke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vanessa Schendel *Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Carsten H G Müller *Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Loitzer Strasse 26, Greifswald, 17489, Germany.
Matthes KenningZoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Loitzer Strasse 26, Greifswald, 17489, Germany.
Michael MaxwellCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Ronald A JennerNatural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Eivind A B Undheim *Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. e.a.b.undheim@ibv.uio.no.
Andy Sombke *Centre for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Cell and Developmental Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Schwarzspanierstrasse 17, Vienna, 1090, Austria. andy.sombke@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-440X

Funding

Australian Research Council DECRA Fellowship DE160101142Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP160104025Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG SO 1289/1HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101039862Norwegian research counsil FRIPRO-YRT Fellowship 287462UK Natural Environment Reserach Council NE/I001530/1University of Queensland International UQ Research Training PhD Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvolution of novelty is a central theme in evolutionary biology, yet studying the origins of traits with an apparently discontinuous origin remains a major challenge. Venom systems are a well-suited model for the study of this phenomenon because they capture several aspects of novelty across multiple levels of biological complexity. However, while there is some knowledge on the evolution of individual toxins, not much is known about the evolution of venom systems as a whole. One way of shedding light on the evolution of new traits is to investigate less specialised serial homologues, i.e. repeated traits in an organism that share a developmental origin. This approach can be particularly informative in animals with repetitive body segments, such as centipedes.

resultsHere, we investigate morphological and biochemical aspects of the defensive telopodal glandular organs borne on the posterior legs of venomous stone centipedes (Lithobiomorpha), using a multimethod approach, including behavioural observations, comparative morphology, proteomics, comparative transcriptomics and molecular phylogenetics. We show that the anterior venom system and posterior telopodal defence system are functionally convergent serial homologues, where one (telopodal defence) represents a model for the putative early evolutionary state of the other (venom). Venom glands and telopodal glandular organs appear to have evolved from the same type of epidermal gland (four-cell recto-canal type) and while the telopodal defensive secretion shares a great degree of compositional overlap with centipede venoms in general, these similarities arose predominantly through convergent recruitment of distantly related toxin-like components. Both systems are composed of elements predisposed to functional innovation across levels of biological complexity that range from proteins to glands, demonstrating clear parallels between molecular and morphological traits in the properties that facilitate the evolution of novelty.

conclusionsThe evolution of the lithobiomorph telopodal defence system provides indirect empirical support for the plausibility of the hypothesised evolutionary origin of the centipede venom system, which occurred through functional innovation and gradual specialisation of existing epidermal glands. Our results thus exemplify how continuous transformation and functional innovation can drive the apparent discontinuous emergence of novelties on higher levels of biological complexity.

Indexed as

ArthropodsAnimalsArthropod VenomsBiological EvolutionPhylogenyTranscriptomeArthropod VenomsArthropodaChilopodaEpidermal exocrine glandsEvolutionInnovationMyriapodaNoveltyTelopodal glandular organsVenom

Identifiers

PMID38867210
PMCPMC11170834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.