ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Performance of MRI for standardized lymph nodes assessment in breast cancer: are we ready for Node-RADS?
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining Node-RADS with ADC can improve diagnostic performance for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Is It Time to Redefine Clinical Nodal Staging for Breast Cancer?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, and Breast MRI for Assessing Tumor Extent and Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Histopathology-Referenced Retrospective Study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Multichannel deep learning-based MRI model for predicting breast cancer axillary lymph node invasion: a comparative study to Node-RADS.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable MRI-based multimodal fusion model for predicting lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Assessment of inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of Node-RADS in colon cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Node-RADS in cervical cancer: a multi-reader agreement and diagnostic performance study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- A head-to-head comparison of MRI and CT using Node-RADS for rectal cancer lymph nodes: Observer agreement and diagnostic performance.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic performance of MRI-based Node-RADS for regional lymph node assessment in treatment-naive rectal cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of pretherapy CT-based Node-RADS for overall survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemoimmunotherapy: a comparison with clinical N staging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Predictive value of node-RADS scoring system for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Standardizing cervical lymph node evaluation in papillary thyroid carcinoma: diagnostic accuracy of Node-RADS on ultrasound.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Advancing breast cancer diagnosis: a combined approach using deep learning-reconstructed diffusion-weighted imaging and Synthetic MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based MRI models for predicting breast cancer axillary lymph node involvement in comparison with Node-RADS: a proof-of-concept study.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of node-RADS classification for primary lymph node assessment in rectal cancer: a modality benchmarking study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-based comparative assessment of ipsilateral vs. contralateral axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients - a pilot study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Node-RADS score was recently introduced to offer a standardized assessment of lymph node invasion (LNI). We tested its diagnostic performance in accurately predicting LNI in breast cancer (BC) patients with magnetic resonance imaging. The study also explores the consistency of the score across three readers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on BC patients who underwent preoperative breast contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and lymph node dissection between January 2020 and January 2023. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for different Node-RADS cut-off values. Pathologic results were considered the gold standard. The overall diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A logistic regression analysis was performed. Cohen's Kappa analysis was used for inter-reader agreement.
resultsThe final population includes 192 patients and a total of 1134 lymph nodes analyzed (372 metastatic and 762 benign). Increasing the Node-RADS cut-off values, specificity and PPV rose from 71.4% to 100% and 76.7% to 100%, respectively, for Reader 1, 69.4% to 100% and 74.6% to 100% for Reader 2, and from 64.3% to 100% and 72% to 100% for Reader 3. Node-RADS > 2 could be considered the best cut-off value due to its balanced performance. Node-RADS exhibited a similar AUC for the three readers (0.97, 0.93, and 0.93). An excellent inter-reader agreement was found (Kappa values between 0.71 and 0.83).
conclusionsThe Node-RADS score demonstrated moderate-to-high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with BC, suggesting that the scoring system can aid in the identification of suspicious lymph nodes and facilitate appropriate treatment decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Node-RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes, suggesting that the scoring system can effectively help identify suspicious lymph nodes by staging the disease and providing a global standardized language for clear communication. KEY POINTS: Axillary lymphadenopathies in breast cancer are crucial for determining the disease stage. Node-RADS was introduced to provide a standardized evaluation of breast cancer lymph nodes. RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.