Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38867078›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Money for operator: the impact of linked agricultural subsidy on incomes.

Haoping Yi, Dengwang Guo, Haomin Wang, Guohui Yi, Longzhen Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haoping Yi *College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Dengwang Guo *College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Haomin Wang *College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Guohui YiPingxiang Agricultural and Rural Industry Development Service Center, Pingxiang, Jiangxi, China.
Longzhen MinCollege of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 2021109010@stu.sicau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reform of China's "three subsidies" has shifted the method of subsidization from payment based on the contracted area to payment based on the actual operational area. Within this context, studying the income-generating impact of the "three subsidies" holds significant practical relevance. Using data from the 2018 China Labor-force Dynamic Survey, this paper employs basic estimation, mediating effect, and moderating effect models to analyze the heterogeneity of agricultural subsidies' impact on rural household income, the mediating effect of agricultural mechanization, and the moderating effect of operation scale. Our findings indicate that agricultural subsidies, known as the "three subsidies", have increased total rural household income and agricultural income while decreasing wage income. However, they have shown no significant impact on business income. Notably, agricultural subsidies have significantly elevated the income of food-producing households, with agricultural mechanization partially mediating this effect. Operation scale positively moderates the impact of agricultural subsidies on rural household income and agricultural mechanization. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that agricultural subsidies have a more significant impact on rural household income among agricultural producers in the eastern region.

Identifiers

PMID38867078
PMCPMC11169248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.