Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866977›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Distinct brain morphometry patterns revealed by deep learning improve prediction of post-stroke aphasia severity.

Alex Teghipco, Roger Newman-Norlund, Julius Fridriksson, Christopher Rorden, Leonardo Bonilha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Precision-Optimised Post-Stroke Prognoses.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex TeghipcoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. alex.teghipco@sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7430-8695
Roger Newman-NorlundDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Christopher RordenDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Extending ezBIDS, NiiVue and dcm2niix for user-friendly cloud-based integration and visualizationRF1MH133701 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RORDEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
Neural Predictors of Anomia Recovery in AphasiaR01DC008355 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008355NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH133701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence suggests that post-stroke aphasia severity depends on the integrity of the brain beyond the lesion. While measures of lesion anatomy and brain integrity combine synergistically to explain aphasic symptoms, substantial interindividual variability remains unaccounted. One explanatory factor may be the spatial distribution of morphometry beyond the lesion (e.g., atrophy), including not just specific brain areas, but distinct three-dimensional patterns.

methodsHere, we test whether deep learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) on whole brain morphometry (i.e., segmented tissue volumes) and lesion anatomy better predicts chronic stroke individuals with severe aphasia (N = 231) than classical machine learning (Support Vector Machines; SVMs), evaluating whether encoding spatial dependencies identifies uniquely predictive patterns.

resultsCNNs achieve higher balanced accuracy and F1 scores, even when SVMs are nonlinear or integrate linear or nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Parity only occurs when SVMs access features learned by CNNs. Saliency maps demonstrate that CNNs leverage distributed morphometry patterns, whereas SVMs focus on the area around the lesion. Ensemble clustering of CNN saliencies reveals distinct morphometry patterns unrelated to lesion size, consistent across individuals, and which implicate unique networks associated with different cognitive processes as measured by the wider neuroimaging literature. Individualized predictions depend on both ipsilateral and contralateral features outside the lesion.

conclusionsThree-dimensional network distributions of morphometry are directly associated with aphasia severity, underscoring the potential for CNNs to improve outcome prognostication from neuroimaging data, and highlighting the prospective benefits of interrogating spatial dependence at different scales in multivariate feature space.

Identifiers

PMID38866977
PMCPMC11169346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.