Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866956›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of psychoanalysis2024

(Why) did it turn wrong? Wholeness or totality of the Internet.

Darius Leskauskas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of psychoanalysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Darius LeskauskasDepartment of Psychiatry, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Eiveniu str. 2, 50161, Kaunas, LT, Lithuania. darius.leskauskas@lsmu.lt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet was created as a space and a structure to share knowledge, information, and opinions for the sake of science and progression of humanity. Today, the Internet is co-created and modified by its users networking from all over the world. It is a representation of humankind, a social structure reactive to local and global societal processes. For the youngest generations the Internet is an integral part of their social milieu influencing both normal and pathological development from their very first year of life. Discussing the roots of totalitarianism, Erik H. Erikson distinguished between wholeness and totality in personal and social development and provided a wonderful metaphor of productive and pathogenic functioning for the impact of the Internet. Conceived as a fruitful association and organization for the development of wholeness in individuals and a future humanity, it largely keeps this promise. But under unfavorable social conditions and/or pathogenic individual predispositions, it can take a totalitarian structure and mode of action.

Indexed as

InternetHumansadolescentsCOVIDdevelopmentInternetpsychotherapytotalitarian object

Identifiers

PMID38866956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.