Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Antagonistic potential and biological control mechanisms of Pseudomonas strains against banded leaf and sheath blight disease of maize.

Manvika Sahgal, Neha Saini, Vandana Jaggi, N T Brindhaa, Manisha Kabdwal, Rajesh Pratap Singh, Anil Prakash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manvika SahgalDepartment of Microbiology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India. sahgal.manvika@gmail.com.
Neha SainiDepartment of Microbiology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Vandana JaggiDepartment of Microbiology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
N T BrindhaaDepartment of Microbiology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Manisha KabdwalDepartment of Microbiology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Rajesh Pratap SinghDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Udam Singh Nagar, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
Anil PrakashDepartment of Microbiology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, 26, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani, the causal agent of banded leaf and sheath blight (BL&SB), poses a significant threat to maize and various crops globally. The increasing concerns surrounding the environmental and health impacts of chemical fungicides have encouraged intensified concern in the development of biological control agents (BCAs) as eco-friendly alternatives. In this study, we explored the potential of 22 rhizobacteria strains (AS1-AS22) isolates, recovered from the grasslands of the Pithoragarh region in the Central Himalayas, as effective BCAs against BL&SB disease. Among these strains, two Pseudomonas isolates, AS19 and AS21, exhibited pronounced inhibition of fungal mycelium growth in vitro, with respective inhibition rates of 57.04% and 54.15% in cell cultures and 66.56% and 65.60% in cell-free culture filtrates. Additionally, both strains demonstrated effective suppression of sclerotium growth. The strains AS19 and AS21 were identified as Pseudomonas sp. by 16S rDNA phylogeny and deposited under accession numbers NAIMCC-B-02303 and NAIMCC-B-02304, respectively. Further investigations revealed the mechanisms of action of AS19 and AS21, demonstrating their ability to induce systemic resistance (ISR) and exhibit broad-spectrum antifungal activity against Alternaria triticina, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Rhizoctonia maydis, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis. Pot trials demonstrated significant reductions in BL&SB disease incidence (DI) following foliar applications of AS19 and AS21, with reductions ranging from 25 to 38.33% compared to control treatments. Scanning electron microscopy revealed substantial degradation of fungal mycelium by the strains, accompanied by the production of hydrolytic enzymes. These findings suggest the potential of Pseudomonas strains AS19 and AS21 as promising BCAs against BL&SB and other fungal pathogens. However, further field trials are warranted to validate their efficacy under natural conditions and elucidate the specific bacterial metabolites responsible for inducing systemic resistance. This study contributes to the advancement of sustainable disease management strategies and emphasizes the potential of Pseudomonas strains AS19 and AS21 in combating BL&SB and other fungal diseases affecting agricultural crops.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPseudomonasRhizoctoniaZea maysAntibiosisBiological Control AgentsPest Control, BiologicalPhylogenyPlant LeavesBiological Control Agents

Identifiers

PMID38866928
PMCPMC11169287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.