Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866789›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Improving prediction accuracy of laser-induced shock wave velocity prediction using neural networks.

Haoyu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Haoyu YangCollege of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA. yhy04@mail.ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The velocity of laser-induced shock waves affects the efficiency and efficacy of laser-based processes. The ability to accurately estimate shock wave velocity is critical for optimizing experimental combinations, creating laser-based systems, and assuring desired results. Traditional approaches to predict shock wave velocity involve empirical equations and analytical models based on simplified assumptions. However, these methods often lack accuracy and fail to capture the complex dynamics of laser-matter interactions. To overcome these limitations, we used a combination of an artificial neural network and a genetic algorithm to predict shock wave velocity. In this method, the neural network structure is dynamically designed. The optimization method does this by modifying the neural network's weights and figuring out the network's structure on our behalf. Based on the findings, our suggested technique worked very well; it surpassed other comparison methods by achieving the lowest average errors in terms of RMSE and MAE, which are 4.38 and 3.74, respectively. Moreover, the analysis has shown that our proposed method has a high level of reliability in predicting impulsive wave velocity using a neural network.

Indexed as

AccuracyLaser parametersNeural networksPredictionShock wave velocity

Identifiers

PMID38866789
PMCPMC11169623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.