ArticleBDJ open2024
Leveraging Large Language Models in the delivery of post-operative dental care: a comparison between an embedded GPT model and ChatGPT.
Article in BDJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Large Language Models in Answering Dental Examination Questions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- The role of large language models in dental diagnosis, decision-making, and communication: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- For the record: a narrative review of ambient voice technology in clinical documentation for dentistry and wider healthcare.British dental journal · 2026Review
- Bridging the Communication Gap: Comparing Digital Tools and Traditional Methods in Post-Extraction Care Delivery.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility evaluation of large language models in anesthesia-specific post-operative care instructions for total knee arthroplasty.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Evaluating open-source LLMs for dental EMR generation.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of embedded chatbot models and ChatGPT-4 for answering orthodontic treatment queries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of the ChatGPT and deepseek models in responding to multiple choice questions related to rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients with complete dentures.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Readability and Quality of Chatbot Responses to Periodontal Patient Queries: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Three Publicly Accessible Large Language Models.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Applications and potential of ChatGPT in dentistry: Scoping review of research perspectives.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Can ChatGPT be trusted? Evaluating AI responses to oral health questions among pregnant Arabic-speaking women.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of generative large language artificial intelligence models for the assessment of dental crowding.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluating large language models using national endodontic specialty examination questions: are they ready for real-world dentistry?BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Assessing the power of AI: a comparative evaluation of large language models in generating patient education materials in dentistry.BDJ open · 2025Article
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Overview Part 2: The Promise and Perils, and the International Dental Federation Communique.International dental journal · 2025Review
- Can a large language model create acceptable dental board-style examination questions? A cross-sectional prospective study.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Is ChatGPT a Reliable Auxiliary Tool in Basic Life Support Training and Education? A Cross-sectional Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Narrative Review on Its Research Applications and Limitations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Accuracy of latest large language models in answering multiple choice questions in dentistry: A comparative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Innovation and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in dentistry - a scoping review.BDJ open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study underscores the transformative role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly the promising applications of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the delivery of post-operative dental care. The aim is to evaluate the performance of an embedded GPT model and its comparison with ChatGPT-3.5 turbo. The assessment focuses on aspects like response accuracy, clarity, relevance, and up-to-date knowledge in addressing patient concerns and facilitating informed decision-making. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn embedded GPT model, employing GPT-3.5-16k, was crafted via GPT-trainer to answer postoperative questions in four dental specialties including Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Periodontics, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, and Prosthodontics. The generated responses were validated by thirty-six dental experts, nine from each specialty, employing a Likert scale, providing comprehensive insights into the embedded GPT model's performance and its comparison with GPT3.5 turbo. For content validation, a quantitative Content Validity Index (CVI) was used. The CVI was calculated both at the item level (I-CVI) and scale level (S-CVI/Ave). To adjust I-CVI for chance agreement, a modified kappa statistic (K*) was computed.
resultsThe overall content validity of responses generated via embedded GPT model and ChatGPT was 65.62% and 61.87% respectively. Moreover, the embedded GPT model revealed a superior performance surpassing ChatGPT with an accuracy of 62.5% and clarity of 72.5%. In contrast, the responses generated via ChatGPT achieved slightly lower scores, with an accuracy of 52.5% and clarity of 67.5%. However, both models performed equally well in terms of relevance and up-to-date knowledge.
conclusionIn conclusion, embedded GPT model showed better results as compared to ChatGPT in providing post-operative dental care emphasizing the benefits of embedding and prompt engineering, paving the way for future advancements in healthcare applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.