Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866672›Full record

Observational studyInternational dental journal2024

Clinical and Radiographic Status and PISF Levels of PGE2 Around Cement and Screw Retained Implants.

Suha Mohammed Aljudaibi, Abdulrahman Ahmed Aseri, Mohammad Abdullah Zayed Alqhtani, Omir Aldowah, Khalid Dhafer S Alhendi, Ahmed A Almeshari

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suha Mohammed AljudaibiDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Ahmed AseriDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: aaaseri@nu.edu.sa.
Mohammad Abdullah Zayed AlqhtaniProsthetic Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Omir AldowahProsthetic Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Dhafer S AlhendiProsthetic Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed A AlmeshariOral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to assess the peri-implant clinicoradiographic status and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples collected from individuals with cement-retained and crew-retained implants.

methodsIn this observational study, participants with cement-retained and screw-retained implants were enrolled. A questionnaire was utilized to gather demographic information and assess the educational background of the participants. Peri-implant modified plaque and bleeding indices, probing depth, and crestal bone loss were measured. Subsequently, PISF samples were collected, and corresponding volumes were recorded. Commercial kits employing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were employed to quantify PGE2 levels. The sample size was determined, and group comparisons were conducted using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the correlation between PGE2 levels and clinicoradiographic and demographics. The predefined level of significance was established at P < .05.

resultsSixty-seven participants, consisting of 33 with cement-retained implants and 34 with screw-retained implants, were included in the study. The mean ages for individuals with cement and screw-retained implants were 54.2 ± 8.7 and 58.7 ± 7.4 years, respectively. The majority of participants had completed university-level education. Reportedly, 87.9% and 82.4% of individuals with cement and screw-retained implants, respectively brushed teeth twice daily. No significant differences were observed in clinicoradiographic parameters, PGE2 volume, and levels between cement-retained and screw-retained implants. There was no correlation between PGE2 levels and peri-implant clinicoradiographic parameters among individuals with either cement-retained or screw-retained implants.

conclusionsCement-retained and screw-retained implants exhibit a consistent peri-implant clinicoradiographic status, accompanied by stable levels of PGE2 in PISF provided oral hygiene maintenance regimens are stringently followed.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsDental ImplantsDinoprostoneAdultAlveolar Bone LossDental CementsFemaleGingival Crevicular FluidHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexDental CementsDental ImplantsDinoprostoneCement-retainedCrestal bone lossDental implantsProbing depthProstaglandin E2Screw-retained

Identifiers

PMID38866672
PMCPMC11551583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.