Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866573›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinicopathological studies of prevalence.

Mikkel Straarup Thagaard, Stine Dahl Vest, Steffen Heegaard, Niels Marcussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikkel Straarup ThagaardDepartment of Pathology, Sygehus Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark mikkel.thagaard@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1181-1215
Stine Dahl VestDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9147-6930
Steffen HeegaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5906-7670
Niels MarcussenDepartment of Pathology, Sygehus Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-9361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) of the eyelid is an aggressive tumour with the ability to metastasise and an increased morbidity. Controversies regarding the epidemiology of this malignant eyelid tumour is widespread in the scientific literature. Western reports repeatedly describes eyelid SGC as a rare occurring tumour in general, accounting for 1%-3% of all eyelid tumours, however studies from Asia have uncovered a higher frequency of eyelid SGC including 54% of all eyelid tumours in Japan, and 43%-56% in India. We wish to retrieve observational data of eyelid SGC prevalence in proportion to total eyelid tumours, from pathological studies published worldwide to resolve this controversy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify published reports on eyelid SGC prevalence proportions, aiming to clarify the incidence of the tumour. We will include observational clinicopathological studies reporting prevalence with confirmed histopathology. No limitations on publication date or language will be applied. Data from the individual studies and study quality will be extracted by two individual reviewers. Study quality will be assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Instrument for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Raw proportions will be transformed and pooled using a random effects model for meta-analysis. And subgroup analysis according to geography will be performed. If data are deemed unsuitable for a meta-analysis, a narrative synthesis will be presented. We will judge the certainty of evidence and present whether this has an overall effect on the results. The results may shed light on a long-standing academic disparity of the scientific literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethical approval. The results of this proposed review will be the subject to a publication in an international peer-reviewed journal within the ophthalmic or pathological specialty. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023487141.

Indexed as

Eyelid NeoplasmsMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSebaceous Gland NeoplasmsSystematic Reviews as TopicAdenocarcinoma, SebaceousHumansPrevalenceepidemiologyobservational studyoculoplasticsophthalmologypathologyreview

Identifiers

PMID38866573
PMCPMC11177665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.