Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38865900›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024

Comparison of different drying pretreatment combined with ultrasonic-assisted enzymolysis extraction of anthocyanins from Lycium ruthenicum Murr.

Yuxing Liu, Yu Deng, Yulong Yang, Hao Dong, Lingling Li, Guogang Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A review ofHeliyon · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuxing LiuCollege of Food, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China.
Yu DengCollege of Food, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China.
Yulong YangCollege of Food, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China.
Hao DongShihezi Quality and Metrology Inspection Institute, Shihezi 832000, China.
Lingling LiCollege of Food, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China. Electronic address: 1457651982@qq.com.
Guogang ChenCollege of Food, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China. Electronic address: cgg611@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extraction of anthocyanins from Lycium ruthenicum Murr. (L. ruthenicum) is a notable challenge in food production, requiring methods that balance efficiency and safety. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis the extraction of anthocyanins by natural air drying (NAD), vacuum freeze drying (VFD), hot air drying (HAD), and vacuum microwave drying (MVD) combined with ultrasonic-assisted enzymolysis extraction (UAEE). The results demonstrated that the extraction yield and antioxidant activity of anthocyanins were significantly higher in VFD. This phenomenon can be attributed to the modification of raw material's microstructure, leading to an increased extraction yield of specific anthocyanins such as Cyanidin-3-galactoside, Delphinidin chloride, Cyanidin, and Petunidin. According to the pretreatment results, the extraction process of anthocyanins was further optimized. The highest yield (3.16 g/100 g) was obtained in following conditions: 0.24 % pectinase, 48 °C, solid:liquid = 1:21, and 21 min ultrasonic time. This study improves the commercial value and potential application of L. ruthenicum in food industry.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninsDesiccationLyciumAntioxidantsChemical FractionationMicrowavesPolygalacturonaseUltrasonic WavesAnthocyaninsAntioxidantsPolygalacturonaseAnthocyaninAnthocyanin targeted metabonomicsDrying methodL. ruthenicumUltrasonic-assisted enzymolysis extraction

Identifiers

PMID38865900
PMCPMC11222793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.