Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38865373›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Application of an ensemble CatBoost model over complex dataset for vehicle classification.

Pemila M, Pongiannan R K, Narayanamoorthi R, Kareem M AboRas, Amr Youssef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pemila MDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, India.
Pongiannan R KDepartment of Computing Technologies, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, India.
Narayanamoorthi RDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-3275
Kareem M AboRasDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0485-468X
Amr YoussefElectrical Engineering Department, University of Business and Technology, Ar Rawdah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0875-6462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of vehicles presents notable challenges within the domain of image processing. Traditional models suffer from inefficiency, prolonged training times for datasets, intricate feature extraction, and variable assignment complexities for classification. Conventional methods applied to categorize vehicles from extensive datasets often lead to errors, misclassifications, and unproductive outcomes. Consequently, leveraging machine learning techniques emerges as a promising solution to tackle these challenges. This study adopts a machine learning approach to alleviate image misclassifications and manage large quantities of vehicle images effectively. Specifically, a contrast enhancement technique is employed in the pre-processing stage to highlight pixel values in vehicle images. In the feature segmentation stage, Mask-R-CNN is utilized to categorize pixels into predefined classes. VGG16 is then employed to extract features from vehicle images, while an autoencoder aids in selecting features by learning non-linear input features and compressing representation features. Finally, the CatBoost (CB) algorithm is implemented for vehicle classification (VC) in diverse critical environments, such as inclement weather, twilight, and instances of vehicle blockage. Extensive experiments are conducted using different large-scale datasets with various machine learning platforms. The findings indicate that CB (presumably a specific method or algorithm) attains the highest level of performance on the large-scale dataset named UFPR-ALPR, with an accuracy rate of 98.89%.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMotor VehiclesNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38865373
PMCPMC11168699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.