Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38865190›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Throat Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Tonsils: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Benedikte Hartvigsen, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Thomas Benfield, Niels Tobias Gredal, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Mathias Waldemar Grønlund, Henning Bundgaard, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Nina Steenhard, Christian von Buchwald and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611203 (Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Oropharyngeal Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Palatine Tonsils - a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611203 naunknown statusnot on this map

Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Oropharyngeal Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Palatine Tonsils - a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsSARS-CoV Infection, Coronavirus, Corona Virus InfectionArmsAn Oropharyngeal swab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Benedikte HartvigsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-5671-7558
Kathrine Kronberg JakobsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0336-5411
Thomas BenfieldDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-9385
Niels Tobias GredalCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-8332-2993
Annette Kjær ErsbøllCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9407-3387
Mathias Waldemar GrønlundDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0679-4254
Henning BundgaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0563-7049
Mikkel Porsborg AndersenCardiology Research Unit, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6162-5205
Nina SteenhardTestCenter Danmark, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0002-6801-6837
Christian von BuchwaldDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-8129
Tobias TodsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3267-3560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTesting for SARS-CoV-2 is essential to provide early COVID-19 treatment for people at high risk of severe illness and to limit the spread of infection in society. Proper upper respiratory specimen collection is the most critical step in the diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in public settings, and throat swabs were the preferred specimens used for mass testing in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is still a discussion about whether throat swabs have a high enough sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as previous studies have reported a large variability in the sensitivity from 52% to 100%. Many previous studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of throat swabs lack a detailed description of the sampling technique, which makes it difficult to compare the different diagnostic accuracy results. Some studies perform a throat swab by only collecting specimens from the posterior oropharyngeal wall, while others also include a swab of the palatine tonsils for SARS-CoV-2 testing. However, studies suggest that the palatine tonsils could have a tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2 that may improve the SARS-CoV-2 detection during sampling. This may explain the variation of sensitivity reported, but no clinical studies have yet explored the differences in sensitivity and patient discomfort whether the palatine tonsils are included during the throat swab or not.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and patient discomfort of a throat swab including the palatine tonsils compared to only swabbing the posterior oropharyngeal wall in molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2.

methodsWe will conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the molecular detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 by a throat swab performed from the posterior oropharyngeal wall and the palatine tonsils (intervention group) or the posterior oropharyngeal wall only (control group). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. All participants fill out a baseline questionnaire upon enrollment in the trial, examining their reason for being tested, symptoms, and previous tonsillectomy. A follow-up questionnaire will be sent to participants to explore the development of symptoms after testing.

resultsA total of 2315 participants were enrolled in this study between November 10, 2022, and December 22, 2022. The results from the follow-up questionnaire are expected to be completed at the beginning of 2024.

conclusionsThis randomized clinical trial will provide us with information about whether throat swabs including specimens from the palatine tonsils will improve the diagnostic sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection. These results can, therefore, be used to improve future testing recommendations and provide additional information about tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05611203; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05611203. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/47446.

Indexed as

COVID-19Palatine TonsilPharynxSARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingAdultCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSensitivity and Specificityclinical laboratory techniquesCOVID-19COVID-19 detectionCOVID-19 testingdetectiondiagnosticdiagnostic accuracydiagnostic procedurediagnostic techniquelaboratorymicrobiologymolecular biologymolecular detectionnasal swabnasal swabsoropharyngealoropharyngeal samplingoropharyngeal swaboropharyngeal swabspalatine tonsilpandemicPCRPCR analysispolymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2swabswabstestingtonsiltoolvirology

Identifiers

PMID38865190
PMCPMC11208824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.