ArticleJAMA network open2024
Updated Estimate of the Number of Extreme Risk Protection Orders Needed to Prevent 1 Suicide.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Lethal Means Counseling on Openness to Out-of-Home Firearm Storage: Results From Project Safe Guard.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026Trial
- Extreme Risk Protection Order Policies and Suicide Risk Among Handgun Owners.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Extreme Risk Protection Orders Among Military Service Members and Veterans.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Using extreme risk protection orders to prevent violence among people experiencing homelessness in California and Colorado: a case series.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- An approach to estimating how effective and well targeted Extreme Risk Protection Orders have been with respect to suicide prevention.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Reduced incidence of arrest following an extreme risk protection order among respondents in California.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Extreme risk protection orders and firearm violence: a synthetic control analysis.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- Predicting Firearm Suicide among US Army Veterans Transitioning from Active Service.Nature. Mental health · 2026Article
- "Police have more standing" vs. "I don't need the cops to stand in for me": public perspectives on police-initiated ERPO petitions in California.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Familial firearm culture among the families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological autopsy interviews.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025Article
- Weighing Medical and Legal Interventions and Potential Harms for Clients at Risk of Firearm Injuries and Deaths.Social work research · 2025Article
- Socio-Spatial Patterns of Suicide Mortality in the United States.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- The Epidemiology of Murder-Suicide in the US, 2016-2022.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- "Has this been tested? Who has it helped? Who has it hurt?": Public perceptions about California's extreme risk protection order law.PloS one · 2025Article
- A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol.Injury epidemiology · 2024Article
- Firearm Restraining Order Implementation Case Study in Lake County, Illinois.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Community and System Advocate Perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Order Implementation: Qualitative Lessons on Client Context, Professionalization, and Equity.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Professional Training and Public Education Can Support Extreme Risk Protection Order Utilization: A Qualitative Study of Professionals in Oregon.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Sponsor's Perspective: Extreme Risk Protection Orders and Building the Evidence Base for Risk-Based Firearm Violence Prevention.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs)-also known as red flag, risk warrant, and gun violence restraining orders-authorize law enforcement, family members, and sometimes others to petition a court to remove firearms from and prevent the acquisition of new firearms by a person judged to pose an immediate danger to themselves or others. Previous estimates suggest that 1 suicide is prevented for every 10 ERPOs issued, a number needed to treat that depends critically on the counterfactual estimate of the proportion of suicidal acts by ERPO respondents that would have involved firearms in the absence of ERPOs. Objective: To empirically inform updated estimates of the number of ERPOs needed to prevent 1 suicide. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from California for method-specific suicides by handgun ownership (October 18, 2004, to December 31, 2015). Handgun-owning suicide decedents in California were identified using individual-level registry data about lawful handgun ownership linked to cause-specific mortality for a cohort of more than 25 million adults. The study also used data from Connecticut for method-specific suicides among ERPO respondents who died by suicide, extracted from published data (October 1999 to June 2013). Data analysis was performed in December 2023. Exposure: Handgun ownership. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the number and distribution of suicidal acts by handgun owners in California, estimated using method-specific suicide mortality data and published case fatality ratios, and the counterfactual number and distribution of suicidal acts and deaths among ERPO respondents in Connecticut had no ERPOs been issued. Results: A total of 1216 handgun owners (mean [SD] age, 50 [18] years; 1019 male [83.8%]) died by suicide during the study period. Among male handgun owners in California, 28% of suicidal acts involved firearms, 54% involved drug poisoning, 9% involved cutting or piercing, 3% involved hanging or suffocation, 2% involved poisoning with solids and/or liquids, and the remaining 4% involved other methods. Assuming this distribution approximates the counterfactual distribution among ERPO respondents in Connecticut in the absence of ERPOs, 1 suicide death was prevented for every 22 ERPOs issued. Conclusions and Relevance: The estimates produced by this cohort study of California handgun owners suggest that ERPOs can play an important role in averting deaths among high-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.