ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Contraction assessment of abdominal muscles using automated segmentation designed for wearable ultrasound applications.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Based Wearable for Older Chronic Back Pain Patients: A Requirement Analysis of a User Interface for Biofeedback.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWearable ultrasound devices can be used to continuously monitor muscle activity. One possible application is to provide real-time feedback during physiotherapy, to show a patient whether an exercise is performed correctly. Algorithms which automatically analyze the data can be of importance to overcome the need for manual assessment and annotations and speed up evaluations especially when considering real-time video sequences. They even could be used to present feedback in an understandable manner to patients in a home-use scenario. The following work investigates three deep learning based segmentation approaches for abdominal muscles in ultrasound videos during a segmental stabilizing exercise. The segmentations are used to automatically classify the contraction state of the muscles.
methodsThe first approach employs a simple 2D network, while the remaining two integrate the time information from the videos either via additional tracking or directly into the network architecture. The contraction state is determined by comparing measures such as muscle thickness and center of mass between rest and exercise. A retrospective analysis is conducted but also a real-time scenario is simulated, where classification is performed during exercise.
resultsUsing the proposed segmentation algorithms, 71% of the muscle states are classified correctly in the retrospective analysis in comparison to 90% accuracy with manual reference segmentation. For the real-time approach the majority of given feedback during exercise is correct when the retrospective analysis had come to the correct result, too.
conclusionBoth retrospective and real-time analysis prove to be feasible. While no substantial differences between the algorithms were observed regarding classification, the networks incorporating the time information showed temporally more consistent segmentations. Limitations of the approaches as well as reasons for failing cases in segmentation, classification and real-time assessment are discussed and requirements regarding image quality and hardware design are derived.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.