Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864974›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2024

The Use of High-Dose Intravenous L-Ascorbate in Pain Therapy: Current Evidence from the Literature.

Rudolf Likar, Ruth Poglitsch, Štěpán Bejvančický, Ludwig Carl, Miroslav Ferencik, Alfred Klein-Watrycz, Monika Rieger, Keveen Salirrosas Flores, Astrid Schumich, Zoe Vlamaki and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rudolf Likar *Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Klagenfurt Am Wörthersee, Chair of Palliative Medicine SFU Vienna, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria. rudolf.likar@kabeg.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6588-5028
Ruth Poglitsch *Medical Institute Dr. Poglitsch, Pain Medicine, Graz, Austria.
Štěpán BejvančickýDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Ludwig CarlDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Mutterhaus Trier, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Miroslav FerencikDepartment of Algesiology SZU, F. D. Roosevelt University Hospital, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia.
Alfred Klein-WatryczInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital Mistelbach, Mistelbach, Austria.
Monika RiegerPain Therapy Practice Rieger, Bingen am Rhein, Germany.
Keveen Salirrosas FloresCayetano Heredia Medical Clinic, Lima, Peru.
Astrid SchumichPrivate Practice for General Medicine, Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Surgery and Functional Myodiagnostics, Vienna, Austria.
Zoe VlamakiGeneral Surgery and Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, NMC Royal Hospital, Khalifa City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Marc WernerClinic for Naturopathy and Integrative Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte GmbH, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of L-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.

methodsThe current literature on the therapeutic effect of L-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous L-ascorbate.

resultsA PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of L-ascorbate in pain treatment. DISCUSSION: Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. L-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.

conclusionsL-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst.

Indexed as

Ascorbic acidComplex regional pain syndromeCritical assessmentIntravenous vitamin Cl-ascorbateNeuralgiaOxidative stressPostoperative painTumor pain

Identifiers

PMID38864974
PMCPMC11255149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.