Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864971›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2024

Agreement of point of care ultrasound and final clinical diagnosis in patients with acute heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock: POCUS not missing the target.

José Atilio Núñez-Ramos, Dagoberto Duarte-Misol, María Andrea Burgos Petro, Keren Jemima Sarmiento Pérez, Vanessa Paola Gutiérrez Echeverry, Sergio Velasco Malagón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Atilio Núñez-RamosHealth Science Division, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia. anunezj@uninorte.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0002-8554-4925
Dagoberto Duarte-MisolEmergency Department, Hospital Universidad del Norte, Soledad, Colombia.
María Andrea Burgos PetroEmergency Department, Hospital Universidad del Norte, Soledad, Colombia.
Keren Jemima Sarmiento PérezEmergency Department, Hospital Universidad del Norte, Soledad, Colombia.
Vanessa Paola Gutiérrez EcheverryEmergency Department, Hospital Universidad del Norte, Soledad, Colombia.
Sergio Velasco MalagónDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3357-3625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool for clinical diagnosis and decision-making in critical and non-critical scenarios. Dyspnea, chest pain, and shock are conditions susceptible to evaluation with ultrasound considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact already proven. There is scarce evidence in diagnosis agreement using ultrasound as an extension of physical examination. We aimed to evaluate ED patients in whom POCUS was performed, to analyze agreement between clinical initial diagnosis using ultrasound images and final diagnosis. Furthermore, we analyze failed diagnosis, inconclusive POCUS exams, and discuss details. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on adults who visited the emergency department with any of these three chief complaints: dyspnea, chest pain, and shock. All were evaluated with ultrasound at admission. Agreement between initial diagnosis using POCUS and final definite diagnosis was calculated. Failed diagnosis and inconclusive exams were analyzed. A total of 209 patients were analyzed. Populations: mostly males, mean age 64 years old, hypertensive. Agreement on patients with dyspnea and suspicion of acute decompensated heart failure was 0.98; agreement on chest pain suspicion of non-ST acute coronary syndrome was 0.96; agreement on type of shock was 0.90. Among the population, 12 patients had an inconclusive POCUS exam, and 16 patients had a failed diagnosis. The use of POCUS in the emergency department shows almost perfect agreement when compared with the final diagnosis in individuals experiencing acutely decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this tool on mortality and prognosis when there are diagnostic errors.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeHeart FailurePoint-of-Care SystemsShockUltrasonographyAgedChest PainCross-Sectional StudiesDyspneaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcute coronary syndromeAgreementDiagnosisHeart failurePoint-of-care ultrasoundShock

Identifiers

PMID38864971
PMCPMC11405453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.