ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection and malfunction in adult patients: incidence, risk factors, and long-term follow-up of single institution experience.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the effect of laparoscopic temporary long-tunneled external ventricular drainage in patients with post-traumatic brain injury hydrocephalus.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Trial
- The Feasibility, Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Etiology and Risk Factors for Shunt Revision in Adult Hydrocephalus: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- A Method to Guide Pressure Selection for Programmable Pressure Valves after Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Infections: Causative Pathogens and Associated Outcomes from Multiple Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improving health literacy and stakeholder-directed knowledge of One Health through analysis of readability: a cross sectional infodemiology study.Science in One Health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery was developed to manage excessive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the brain's ventricles and is considered a mainstream treatment. Despite the development of the shunt device system, various complications still occur. In this study, we reported 307 cases and a long-term follow-up of at least five years of adult patients who underwent VP shunt surgery and analyzed various factors that may affect revision surgery. A retrospective study was conducted at Asan Medical Center, Korea, a tertiary medical center. We reviewed 307 cases from January 2012 to December 2018. The patients' neurological status, predisposing medical conditions, laboratory findings, and other operation-related factors were reviewed using electrical medical records. The normal function group comprised 272 cases (88.6%), and the overall incidence of revision group comprised 35 cases (11.4%). Of the 35 revision surgery cases, 30 (85.71%) were due to shunt malfunctions, such as obstruction, overdrainage, and valve-related errors while 5 (14.29%) were due to shunt infection. Patient demographics, mental status, and operation time did not influence revision as risk factors. Serum laboratory findings showed no statistical difference between the two groups. The white blood cell (WBC) count in the CSF profile differed significantly between the two groups. The Hakim Programmable valve (Codman, USA) is mainly used in our center. In addition, various shunt systems were used, including Strata Regulatory valve (Medtronic, USA), proGAV (Aesculap, USA), and Accu-Flo (Codman, USA). This study analyzed the factors affecting long-term outcomes. Based on these findings, efforts are needed to achieve more favorable outcomes in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38864925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.