Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864890›Full record

ArticleLung2024

Ultrathin Bronchoscopy Without Virtual Navigation for Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions.

Ali Sadoughi, Shwe Synn, Christine Chan, David Schecter, Gabriel Hernandez Romero, Sahil Virdi, Abhishek Sarkar, Mimi Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali SadoughiDivision of Pulmonary, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, USA. asadough@montefiore.org.
Shwe SynnDepartment of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, USA.
Christine ChanDivision of Pulmonary, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, USA.
David SchecterDivision of Pulmonary, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, USA.
Gabriel Hernandez RomeroDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.
Sahil VirdiDivision of pulmonary and critical care, United Hospital Center, West Virginia University Health System, Charleston, USA.
Abhishek SarkarSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Westchester Medical Center / New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.
Mimi KimDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing incidence of encountering lung nodules necessitates an ongoing search for improved diagnostic procedures. Various bronchoscopic technologies have been introduced or are in development, but further studies are needed to define a method that fits best in clinical practice and health care systems. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do basic bronchoscopic tools including a combination of thin (outer diameter 4.2 mm) and ultrathin bronchoscopes (outer diameter 3.0 mm), radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and fluoroscopy perform in peripheral pulmonary lesion diagnosis? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThis is a retrospective review of the performance of peripheral bronchoscopy using thin and ultrathin bronchoscopy with rEBUS and 2D fluoroscopy without a navigational system for evaluating peripheral lung lesions in a single academic medical center from 11/2015 to 1/2021. We used a strict definition for diagnostic yield and assessed the impact of different variables on diagnostic yield, specifically after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the independent associations of the most impactful variables.

resultsA total of 322 patients were included in this study. The median of the long axis diameter was 2.2 cm and the median distance of the center of the lesion from the visceral pleural surface was 1.9 cm. Overall diagnostic yield was 81.3% after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope, with more detection of concentric rEBUS views (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for detecting malignancy also increased from 60.5% to 74.7% (p = 0.033) after incorporating the ultrathin scope into practice, while bronchus sign and peripheral location of the lesion were not found to affect diagnostic yield. Concentric rEBUS view, solid appearance, upper/middle lobe location and larger size of the nodules were found to be independent predictors of successful achievement of diagnosis at bronchoscopy.

interpretationThis study demonstrates a high diagnostic yield of biopsy of lung lesions achieved by utilization of thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes. Direct visualization of small peripheral airways with simultaneous rEBUS confirmation increased localization rate of small lesions in a conventional bronchoscopy setting without virtual navigational planning.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyLung NeoplasmsAgedBronchoscopesEndosonographyEquipment DesignFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleLung cancerLung nodulePeripheral airway bronchoscopyRadial endobronchial ultrasoundUltrathin bronchoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38864890
PMCPMC11427480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.