ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
The strongest protein binder is surprisingly labile.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The strongest protein binder is surprisingly labile.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial adhesins are cell-surface proteins that anchor to the cell wall of the host. The first stage of infection involves the specific attachment to fibrinogen (Fg), a protein found in human blood. This attachment allows bacteria to colonize tissues causing diseases such as endocarditis. The study of this family of proteins is hence essential to develop new strategies to fight bacterial infections. In the case of the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus, there exists a class of adhesins known as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs). Here, we focus on one of them, the clumping factor A (ClfA), which has been found to bind Fg through the dock-lock-latch mechanism. Interestingly, it has recently been discovered that MSCRAMM proteins employ a catch-bond to withstand forces exceeding 2 nN, making this type of interaction as mechanically strong as a covalent bond. However, it is not known whether this strength is an evolved feature characteristic of the bacterial protein or is typical only of the interaction with its partner. Here, we combine single-molecule force spectroscopy, biophysical binding assays, and molecular simulations to study the intrinsic mechanical strength of ClfA. We find that despite the extremely high forces required to break its interactions with Fg, ClfA is not by itself particularly strong. Integrating the results from both theory and experiments we dissect contributions to the mechanical stability of this protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.