Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864499›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2024

Coevolutionary analysis of Pseudomonas syringae-phage interactions to help with rational design of phage treatments.

Mojgan Rabiey, Emily R Grace, Paulina Pawlos, Muscab Bihi, Haleem Ahmed, Georgina E Hampson, Amna Al Riyami, Leena Alharbi, Rosa Sanchez-Lucas, Naina Korotania and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mojgan RabieySchool of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-9087
Emily R GraceSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paulina PawlosSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Muscab BihiSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Haleem AhmedSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Georgina E HampsonSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Amna Al RiyamiSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Leena AlharbiSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rosa Sanchez-LucasSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Naina KorotaniaSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Maria Laura CiusaSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Olivia MosleySchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michelle T HulinDepartment of Plant Soil & Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Laura BaxterBioinformatics Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sabrine DhaouadiSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Diana Vinchira-VillarragaSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Robert W JacksonSchool of Biosciences and the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2042-4105

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P006272/1European Union's Horizon H2020 Research and Innovation ProgrammeJABBS FoundationPlant Bacterial Diseases Programme BB/T010568/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treating plant bacterial diseases is notoriously difficult because of the lack of available antimicrobials. Pseudomonas syringae pathovar syringae (Pss) is a major pathogen of cherry (Prunus avium) causing bacterial canker of the stem, leaf and fruit, impacting productivity and leading to a loss of trees. In an attempt to find a treatment for this disease, naturally occurring bacteriophage (phage) that specifically target Pss is being investigated as a biocontrol strategy. However, before using them as a biocontrol treatment, it is important to both understand their efficacy in reducing the bacterial population and determine if the bacterial pathogens can evolve resistance to evade phage infection. To investigate this, killing curve assays of five MR phages targeting Pss showed that phage resistance rapidly emerges in vitro, even when using a cocktail of the five phages together. To gain insight to the changes occurring, Pss colonies were collected three times during a 66-h killing curve assay and separately, Pss and phage were also coevolved over 10 generations, enabling the measurement of genomic and fitness changes in bacterial populations. Pss evolved resistance to phages through modifications in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis pathways. Bacterial fitness (growth) and virulence were affected in only a few mutants. Deletion of LPS-associated genes suggested that LPS was the main target receptor for all five MR phages. Later generations of coevolved phages from the coevolution experiment were more potent at reducing the bacterial density and when used with wild-type phages could reduce the emergence of phage-resistant mutants. This study shows that understanding the genetic mechanisms of bacterial pathogen resistance to phages is important for helping to design a more effective approach to kill the bacteria while minimizing the opportunity for phage resistance to manifest.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPseudomonas syringaeBacteriophagesPseudomonas Phages

Identifiers

PMID38864499
PMCPMC11167607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.