Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864426›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2024

Difference in Endocytosis Pathways Used by Differentiated Versus Nondifferentiated Epithelial Caco-2 Cells to Internalize Nanosized Particles.

Azzah Bannunah, Robert Cavanagh, Saif Shubber, Driton Vllasaliu, Snow Stolnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Food: Dietary Toxicology Beyond Particle Counts.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Upconversion Colloid for Tracking Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Azzah BannunahSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
Robert CavanaghSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
Saif ShubberSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
Driton VllasaliuSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, U.K.
Snow StolnikSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-2345-5062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the internalization of nanosized particles by mucosal epithelial cells is essential in a number of areas including viral entry at mucosal surfaces, nanoplastic pollution, as well as design and development of nanotechnology-type medicines. Here, we report our comparative study on pathways of cellular internalization in epithelial Caco-2 cells cultured in vitro as either a polarized, differentiated cell layer or as nonpolarized, nondifferentiated cells. The study reveals a number of differences in the extent that endocytic processes are used by cells, depending on their differentiation status and the nature of applied nanoparticles. In

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEndocytosisEpithelial CellsNanoparticlesCaco-2 CellsCholesterolClathrinDynaminsHumansCholesterolClathrinDynaminsendocytosisepithelial cell uptakeinhibitorspolarized and differentiated cells

Identifiers

PMID38864426
PMCPMC11220748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.