Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864375›Full record

ArticleXenotransplantation

Hemodynamics in pig-to-baboon heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation: Recovery from perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction and impairment by cardiac overgrowth.

Martin Bender, Alessandro Panelli, Bruno Reichart, Julia Radan, Maren Mokelke, Elisabeth Neumann, Ines Buttgereit, Sebastian Michel, Andreas Bauer, Ann Kathrin Fresch and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Progress in Orthotopic Pig Heart Transplantation in Nonhuman Primates.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Martin BenderDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-4728
Alessandro PanelliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CVK, CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bruno ReichartTransregional Collaborative Research Center 127, Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-3664
Julia RadanTransregional Collaborative Research Center 127, Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maren MokelkeTransregional Collaborative Research Center 127, Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth NeumannTransregional Collaborative Research Center 127, Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ines ButtgereitDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian MichelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas BauerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ann Kathrin FreschTransregional Collaborative Research Center 127, Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tanja MayrDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian WernerTransregional Collaborative Research Center 127, Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie EgererGene Center and Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea BährGene Center and Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8075-8222
Barbara KesslerGene Center and Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nikolai KlymiukGene Center and Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
David AyaresRevivicor, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Eckhard WolfGene Center and Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0430-9510
Christian HaglDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paolo BrennerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias LänginDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-4941
Jan-Michael AbichtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-1249

Funding

German Research Foundation TRR 127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOrthotopic cardiac xenotransplantation has seen notable improvement, leading to the first compassionate use in 2022. However, it remains challenging to define the clinical application of cardiac xenotransplantation, including the back-up strategy in case of xenograft failure. In this regard, the heterotopic thoracic technique could be an alternative to the orthotopic procedure. We present hemodynamic data of heterotopic thoracic pig-to-baboon transplantation experiments, focusing on perioperative xenograft dysfunction and xenograft overgrowth.

methodsWe used 17 genetically modified piglets as donors for heterotopic thoracic xenogeneic cardiac transplantation into captive-bred baboons. In all animals, pressure probes were implanted in the graft's left ventricle and the recipient's ascending aorta and hemodynamic data (graft pressure, aortic pressure and recipient's heart rate) were recorded continuously.

resultsAortic pressures and heart rates of the recipients' hearts were postoperatively stable in all experiments. After reperfusion, three grafts presented with low left ventricular pressure indicating perioperative cardiac dysfunction (PCXD). These animals recovered from PCXD within 48 h under support of the recipient's heart and there was no difference in survival compared to the other 14 ones. After 48 h, graft pressure increased up to 200 mmHg in all 17 animals with two different time-patterns. This led to a progressive gradient between graft and aortic pressure. With increasing gradient, the grafts stopped contributing to cardiac output. Grafts showed a marked weight increase from implantation to explantation.

conclusionThe heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation technique is a possible method to overcome PCXD in early clinical trials and an experimental tool to get a better understanding of PCXD. The peculiar hemodynamic situation of increasing graft pressure but missing graft's output indicates outflow tract obstruction due to cardiac overgrowth. The heterotopic thoracic technique should be successful when using current strategies of immunosuppression, organ preservation and donor pigs with smaller body and organ size.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationHemodynamicsHeterograftsPapioTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansSwineTransplantation, Heterotopicheartheterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantationorgan growthorgan overgrowthPCXDperioperative xenograft dysfunctionprimary graft failure

Identifiers

PMID38864375
PMCPMC11167678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.