Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864326›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Dogs do not use their own experience with novel barriers to infer others' visual access.

Lucrezia Lonardo, Martina Putnik, Veronika Szewczak, Ludwig Huber, Christoph J Völter

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucrezia LonardoComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna , Vienna 1210, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-3766
Martina PutnikComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna , Vienna 1210, Austria.
Veronika SzewczakComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna , Vienna 1210, Austria.
Ludwig HuberComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna , Vienna 1210, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-136X
Christoph J VölterComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna , Vienna 1210, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8368-7201

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262City of Viennaithuba Capital AGVienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive research into the Theory of Mind abilities in non-human animals, it remains controversial whether they can attribute mental states to other individuals or whether they merely predict future behaviour based on previous behavioural cues. In the present study, we tested pet dogs (in total,

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCooperative BehaviorCuesDogsFemaleLearningMaleTheory of Minddog cognitionexperience-projection testgoggles testsocial cognitiontheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID38864326
PMCPMC7616301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.