ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024
Large and non-spherical seeds are less likely to form a persistent soil seed bank.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latitudinal diversity gradients of soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation in China.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Onshore Wind Energy Development Causes Localized but Lasting Shifts in Plant Community Composition and Function.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Inconsistent relationships detected between seed size, shape and persistence for different plant functional groups in the Pannonian flora.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Seed Size-Number Trade-Off in Populations of a Cosmopolitan Species (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The context dependency of nitrogen deposition impacts on the compositional coupling between aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Epitranscriptomics as a Candidate Universal Modulator of Dormancy Transitions.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Seed Size-Number Trade-Off Exists in Graminoids but Not in Forbs or Legumes: A Study from 11 Common Species in Alpine Steppe Communities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Global Patterns in the Evolutionary Relations Between Seed Mass and Germination Traits.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Large and non-spherical seeds are less likely to form a persistent soil seed bank.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is some evidence that seed traits can affect the long-term persistence of seeds in the soil. However, findings on this topic have differed between systems. Here, we brought together a worldwide database of seed persistence data for 1474 species to test the generality of seed mass-shape-persistence relationships. We found a significant trend for low seed persistence to be associated with larger and less spherical seeds. However, the relationship varied across different clades, growth forms and species ecological preferences. Specifically, relationships of seed mass-shape-persistence were more pronounced in Poales than in other order clades. Herbaceous species that tend to be found in sites with low soil sand content and precipitation have stronger relationships between seed shape and persistence than in sites with higher soil sand content and precipitation. For the woody plants, the relationship between persistence and seed morphology was stronger in sites with high soil sand content and low precipitation than in sites with low soil sand content and higher precipitation. Improving the ability to predict the soil seed bank formation process, including burial and persistence, could benefit the utilization of seed morphology-persistence relationships in management strategies for vegetation restoration and controlling species invasion across diverse vegetation types and environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.