Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864307›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2025

Autistic adults' perspectives and experiences of diagnostic assessments that include play across the lifespan.

Emma Pritchard-Rowe, Carmen de Lemos, Katie Howard, Jenny Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Who I am": understanding the self-identity process of autism in adults in the UK.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma Pritchard-RoweUniversity of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-4609
Carmen de LemosUniversity of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5352-9432
Katie HowardUniversity of Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5731-6490
Jenny GibsonUniversity of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6172-6265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractPlay is often included in autism diagnostic assessments. These assessments tend to focus on negatives and how people who are not autistic interpret observable behaviours. It is important to take a neurodiversity-affirmative assessment approach. This involves focusing on what autistic people say and looking at strengths and needs. We wanted to find out how autistic adults experience diagnostic assessments that include play. We asked autistic and non-autistic people to help us design our study and interview questions. We then interviewed 22 autistic adults to find out what they think about the use of play in assessments. We used a qualitative method called interpretative phenomenological analysis to analyse the data. Autistic adults told us about the different ways play was included in their diagnostic assessments. For example, some completed a diagnostic tool called the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. Autistic adults also talked about the importance of considering how autistic people are different to each other. For example, we found that play may not be useful for assessing women or girls who mask. This suggests that professionals should adopt a personalised approach to diagnostic assessments that use play catering to each person's needs. Our findings also suggested that professionals should assess strengths and differences as well as needs.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderPlay and PlaythingsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung Adultassessmentautismautistic perspectivesdiagnosisneurodiversityplay

Identifiers

PMID38864307
PMCPMC11656625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.