ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Detection Methods for Rapid Largemouth Bass Ranavirus Surveillance.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Advances in Rapid Nucleic Acid Diagnostics for Hepatitis B and C Viruses: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- CRISPR-on-Chip for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.ACS nano · 2026Review
- Paper-Based Microfluidic Chips for At-Home Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Testing: Applications and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- One-Pot Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Assisted CRISPR/Cas Detection Technology: Challenges, Strategies, and Perspectives.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Enhanced One-Pot Cas12a-Based Nucleic Acid Detection via Epitope Insertion and Recruitment of Rad51.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Rapid detection ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- CRISPR for companion diagnostics in low-resource settings.Lab on a chip · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to their ability to selectively target pathogen-specific nucleic acids, CRISPR-Cas systems are increasingly being employed as diagnostic tools. "One-pot" assays that combine nucleic acid amplification and CRISPR-Cas systems (NAAT-CRISPR-Cas) in a single step have emerged as one of the most popular CRISPR-Cas biosensing formats. However, operational simplicity comes at a cost, with one-pot assays typically being less sensitive than corresponding two-step NAAT-CRISPR-Cas assays and often failing to detect targets at low concentrations. It is thought that these performance reductions result from the competition between the two enzymatic processes driving the assay, namely, Cas-mediated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.