ReviewJournal of biosciences2024
The first embryo, the origin of cancer and animal phylogeny. III. The totipotency as revealed by morphogenesis and the neoplasia controlled by cellular differentiation.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The first embryo, the origin of cancer and animal phylogeny. V. Cancer stem cells as the unifying biomechanical principle between embryology and oncology.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have extensively described that the neoplastic process (NP) has deep evolutionary roots and we have made specific predictions about the connection between cancer and the formation of the first embryo, which allowed for the evolutionary radiation of metazoans. My main hypothesis is that the NP is at the heart of cellular mechanisms responsible for animal morphogenesis, and given its embryological basis, also at the center of cell differentiation-one of the most interesting and relevant aspects of embryogenesis. In this article, I take forward the idea of the role of physics in the modeling of the neoplastic functional module (NFM) and its contribution to morphogenesis to reveal the totipotency of the zygote. In my consideration of these arguments, I examine mechanical and biophysical clues and their intimate connection with cellular differentiation. I expound on how cancer biology is perfectly intertwined with embryonic differentiation and why it is considered a disease of cell differentiation. The neoplasia is controlled by textural gradients that lead to cell differentiation within the embryo. Thus, the embryo would be a benign tumor. Finally, inspired by evolutionary history and by what the nervous system represents for current biology and based on the impressive nervous system of ctenophores as seen in fossil records, I propose a hypothesis with physical foundations (mechanical morphogenesis) for the formation of a preneural pattern of the nervous system of the first animal embryo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38864237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.