Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864213›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Distribution of COVID-19 Home Testing Through Community Health Centers: Results of the

Jesse N Nodora, Maria Elena Martinez, Corinne McDaniels-Davidson, Jian Shen, Amy M Sitapati, Francesca Torriani, Jess Mandel, Linda Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jesse N NodoraUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6756-4423
Maria Elena MartinezUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Corinne McDaniels-DavidsonUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jian ShenUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Amy M SitapatiUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Francesca TorrianiUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jess MandelUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Linda HillUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

CRC-HUB-SPOKE: A ColoRectal Cancer screening Hub for Southern California community health centers.UH3CA233314 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GUPTA, SAMIR, HILL, LINDA L · 2020 to 2023
$4.9M
CRC-HUB-SPOKE: A ColoRectal Cancer screening Hub for Southern California community health centers.UG3CA233314 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CASTANEDA, SHEILA FAYE, GUPTA, SAMIR · 2019 to 2019
$604k
NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA233314NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA233314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess acceptability and feasibility of rapid at-home COVID-19 testing and reporting of test results among individuals seeking care at community health centers (CHCs) and their household members.

methodsParticipants were recruited from 2 Community Health Centers during a clinic visit or a community event. Over-the-counter COVID-19 tests were distributed to participants for self-testing and to offer testing to household members. Separate surveys were administered to collect baseline information on the study participant and to collect test results on the study participant and household members. We calculated the proportion of individuals who agreed to complete COVID home testing, those who reported test results, and the test positivity. For household members, we calculated the proportion who completed and reported results and the positivity rate. We assessed reasons for undergoing COVID-19 testing and the action taken by participants who reported positive tests.

resultsA total of 2189 individuals were approached by CHC staff for participation and 1013 (46.3%) agreed to participate. Among the 959 participants with complete sociodemographic data, 88% were Hispanic and 82.6% were female. The proportion providing test results was 36.2% and the test positivity was 4.2%. Among the 1927 test reports, 35.3% for the index participant and 64.4% were for household members. The largest proportion of test results were for index participants (35.3%) and the second largest was for the participant's children (32.1%), followed by parents (16.9%), and spouse/partner (13.2%). The 2 most common reasons for testing were symptoms (29%) and attending family gatherings (26%). Among test-positive individuals (n = 80), most (83.3%) noted that they isolated but only 16.3% called their provider and 1.3% visited a clinic.

conclusionOur results show interest in at-home COVID-19 testing of multiple household members, as we headed into the endemic phase of the pandemic. However, reporting of test results was modest and among test-positive individuals, reporting results to a provider was very low. These results underscore the challenges with reporting and following guidelines among people undergoing home testing for COVID-19, which may have implications for future pandemics.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingAdolescentAdultAgedChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSARS-CoV-2Self-TestingYoung Adultcommunity healthCOVIDhealth inequitieshealth promotionunderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID38864213
PMCPMC11168037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.