Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864117›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Embedding Public Involvement in a PhD Research Project With People Affected by Advanced Liver Disease.

Cathy J Beresford, Mahabuba Rahman, Yvonne Gray, Sandra Ramshaw, Leslie Gelling, Sue Baron, Jackie Dominey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cathy J BeresfordDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-3465
Mahabuba RahmanMember of the Public Involvement Group.
Yvonne GrayMember of the Public Involvement Group.
Sandra RamshawMember of the Public Involvement Group.
Leslie GellingDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6577-8639
Sue BaronDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5977-599X
Jackie DomineyLewis-Manning Hospice Care, Poole, Dorset, UK.

Funding

This paper forms part of a PhD project match-funded by Lewis-Manning Hospice Care and Bournemouth University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver disease is an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in the United Kingdom and can be challenging to live with in the advanced stages. There has been little research exploring the healthcare experiences of UK individuals with decompensated disease when the liver cannot carry out its functions properly. A PhD research project was developed with people who have liver disease to explore care experiences in decompensated advanced liver disease. Public involvement (PI) is an essential aspect of meaningful health research, and this paper reports on the progression of our PI approach in this ongoing study.

objectiveTo embed PI throughout the research project to ensure that the study is meaningful to individuals with liver disease and the people who support them.

methodsThe research adopts a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology to develop a theory of care experience. Various PI approaches were considered in developing the PI strategy for this qualitative study. Initially, Embedded consultation was the preferred model, which has evolved to include aspects of collaboration and coproduction. A PI group was set up to oversee the project through the national public engagement website VOICE, and reflections on PI from three members of the group are included in this paper to illuminate the PI process.

resultsSix individuals with liver disease and three carers from across the United Kingdom are part of an ongoing PI group. Their role includes commenting on the findings of the systematic literature review for this project and contributing to decisions about recruitment, data collection and data analysis. Additionally, they had a direct impact on changing the focus of the research. The PI group will continue involvement until the completion of the project.

conclusionSuccessfully embedding PI into doctoral research, as demonstrated in this project, requires commitment, planning and dedication to reciprocal working for the benefit of PI contributors as well as the research. This approach could be adopted by other postgraduate researchers. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project is overseen by the PI group, whose contribution is described throughout, including reflections from three PI group members.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationLiver DiseasesQualitative ResearchFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansMaleUnited Kingdomcollaboration and coproductionembedded consultationliver diseaseparticipatory researchPhD researchpublic involvement

Identifiers

PMID38864117
PMCPMC11167232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.