Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864075›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Feasibility and acceptability of autism adapted safety plans: an external pilot randomised controlled trial.

Jacqui Rodgers, Sarah Cassidy, Mirabel Pelton, Jane Goodwin, Janelle Wagnild, Nawaraj Bhattarai, Isabel Gordon, Colin Wilson, Phil Heslop, Emmanuel Ogundimu and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Experiences of self-harm, suicidal ideation and mental health care among autistic youth.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jacqui RodgersPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.
Sarah CassidySchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Mirabel PeltonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.
Jane GoodwinPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.
Janelle WagnildDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, DH1 3LE, UK.
Nawaraj BhattaraiHealth Economics Group, Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.
Isabel GordonSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Colin WilsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.
Phil HeslopSocial Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, NE7 7XA, UK.
Emmanuel OgundimuDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, DH1 3LE, UK.
Rory C O'ConnorSuicidal Behaviour Research Lab, School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.
Sheena E RamsayPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.
Ellen TownsendSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Luke ValeHealth Economics Group, Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autistic people are a high-risk group for self-harm and suicide. There are no evidence-based suicide prevention interventions developed specifically for autistic people. We undertook a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of autism adapted safety plans (AASP) to reduce self-harm and suicide for autistic people. Methods: This study took place in the United Kingdom and followed a randomised, two-arm, controlled design. Autistic adults (n = 53, mean age = 39, gender = 49% female, 29% not male or female) were recruited via third sector organisations and self-referral between 11.8.21 and 19.10.22. Participants were randomised without stratification to usual care with or without AASP. The AASP was completed by the autistic adults together with someone trained to support them. Research staff who completed follow-up assessments were blind to participant allocation. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Participants were assessed at baseline, 1 and 6 months. Primary data were analysed under the intention to treat principle. Study protocol is published. The trial is closed to new participants. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN70594445. Findings: 53 participants consented, 49 were randomised to either AASP with usual care (n = 25) or usual care (n = 24). 68% of participants in the AASP arm were satisfied with the AASP and 41% rated it as useable. Feedback on the AASP and research methods were positive with suggested adaptations to some outcome measures. Retention and completion of outcomes measures in both arms was excellent, as was fidelity of delivery of the AASP. Interpretation: Study progression criteria were met, suggesting that the parameters of a future definitive trial of clinical and cost effectiveness of AASP to reduce self-harm and suicide in autistic adults are achievable, with minor recommended adaptions to outcome measures and AASP. Future research should explore the use of AASP in routine clinical practice. Funding: This study is funded by the NIHR [Public Health Research Programme (NIHR129196)].

Indexed as

AutismAutistic adultsSafety planningSelf-harmSuicide

Identifiers

PMID38864075
PMCPMC11165343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.