ReviewPNAS nexus2024
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making.
Review in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of generative AI on health professional education: A systematic review in the context of student learning.Medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education, training and research: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Current state of artificial intelligence applications in assisted reproductive technology: A narrative review.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- A Multidimensional Analysis of AI Literacy Determinants: External Resources, Digital Skills, and Psychological Profile Among University Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ten simple rules for effective use of generative AI for code development in environmental science.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence needs better health systems to reduce inequalities.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Can AI help reduce prejudice? Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-powered personalized persuasion on support for transgender rights.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Article
- Moral stereotyping in large language models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- The association between national culture and AI readiness: a cross-national study.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Reforming competitive global public health funding: Bridging equity and practice gaps.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Explaining women's skepticism toward artificial intelligence: The role of risk orientation and risk exposure.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Technological impact, generality, and complementarity of artificial intelligence patents: Evidence from Samsung Electronics.PloS one · 2026Article
- The impact of artificial intelligence perception on university students' academic engagement: the mediating role of academic motivation and the moderating role of academic self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Regional cognitive pathways to intention to use AI: a structural equation modeling approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Navigating artificial intelligence in qualitative research: ethical and practical considerations from concept to publication.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Article
- Higher-order interactions shape collective human behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2025Review
- Improving Early Prostate Cancer Detection Through Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.