Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863988›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Effective re-induction regimen for children with recurrent medulloblastoma.

Katrina O'Halloran, Sheetal Phadnis, Gregory K Friedman, Katie Metrock, Tom B Davidson, Nathan J Robison, Benita Tamrazi, Jennifer A Cotter, Girish Dhall, Ashley S Margol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katrina O'HalloranKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sheetal PhadnisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Gregory K FriedmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Katie MetrockDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Tom B DavidsonKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nathan J RobisonKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Benita TamraziKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jennifer A CotterKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Girish DhallDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Ashley S MargolKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is no standard treatment for the recurrence of medulloblastoma, the most common malignant childhood brain tumor, and prognosis remains dismal. In this study, we introduce a regimen that is well-tolerated and effective at inducing remission. Methods: The primary objectives of this study were to assess tolerability of the regimen and overall response rate (ORR). A retrospective chart review of patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, treated at two institutions with a re-induction regimen of intravenous irinotecan and cyclophosphamide with oral temozolomide and etoposide, was performed. Demographic, clinicopathologic, toxicity, and response data were collected and analyzed. Results: Nine patients were identified. Median age was 5.75 years. Therapy was well-tolerated with no therapy-limiting toxicities and no toxic deaths. Successful stem cell collection was achieved in all 5 patients in whom it was attempted. ORR after 2 cycles was 78%. Three patients had a complete response, 4 patients had a partial response, 1 patient had stable disease, and 1 patient had progressive disease. Four patients are alive with no evidence of disease (NED), 2 patients are alive with disease, 2 patients have died of disease, and 1 patient died of toxicity related to additional therapy (NED at time of death). Conclusions: This regimen is well-tolerated and effective. Tumor response was noted in the majority of cases, allowing patients to proceed to additional treatment with no or minimal disease. Further study of this regimen in a clinical trial setting is an important next step.

Indexed as

medulloblastomarecurrencere-induction

Identifiers

PMID38863988
PMCPMC11165644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.